Examples

Suppose you’re leading a design team and you want to decide which design tool you want to use as a team. This can be a web page design at the ICT lecture or this can be the process of a new product. Examples can be more up to creativity. You’ve done some research and you narrowed down your options to three: Sketch, Figma and Framer. Let’s put them in your decision matrix table.

FactorsTBDTBDTBDScore
Weights    
Sketch    
Figma    
Framer    

Now let’s look at the factors you need to consider. You have a set budget for tools so the cost will be the first factor. After discussing with your team, you agree that the prototyping and collaboration capabilities of a tool are most important for them. Now you have the factors that will influence the decision.

FactorsCostPrototypingCollaborationScore
Weights    
Sketch    
Figma    
Framer    

It’s time to score each option on every factor. Let’s use a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 is the worst, 5 is the best), but you can use any scale you like.

Cost – You find out that Figma and Framer both cost £12/editor/month, while Sketch is a little cheaper at 9 euros. You’ll score them 3 and 4 respectively.

Prototyping – Framer comes out as the most powerful in prototyping. Figma and Sketch are somewhat similar, but Figma can do a little more. Framer gets a 5, Figma a 3 and Sketch a 2.

Collaboration – You let your team evaluate this one. They agree that Figma is the best for collaboration, scoring it with 5. Sketch and Framer both get a 3.

Let’s see how these look like in your decision matrix:

FactorsCostPrototypingCollaborationScore
Weights    
Sketch423 
Figma335 
Framer353 

At this point, the decision might be a little clearer, but all factors aren’t equally important. You need to add weight to them. Since your budget is set, the cost factor is the most important, making it a 5. Your team says that prototyping is a little more important for them than collaboration features. You weight the factors accordingly:

FactorsCostPrototypingCollaborationScore
Weights543 
Sketch423 
Figma335 
Framer353 

The next step is multiplying the scores with the weight of each factor. Score on each factor then adds up to a final score for every option:

FactorsCostPrototypingCollaborationScore
Weights543 
Sketch4*5 = 202*4 = 83*3 = 937
Figma3*5 = 153*4 = 125*3 = 1542
Framer3*5 = 155*4 = 203*3 = 944

And there you have it. You have a score for each option based on the factors that are important for you. In this case, Framer comes out as the winner.

Decision matrix is a very useful tool for situations like this. When there are multiple factors to consider, this tools removes the uncertainty and subjectivity from your decision-making. It allows you to clearly figure out which decision is the most reasonable to make.

The European Commission support for the production of this communication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents
which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made
of the information contained therein
2020-1-ES01-KA202-082113